Ad

Thursday, July 5, 2012

"Secret Combinations". U.N. Treaty To Take Away Our Right To Bear Arms.

From killing someone to make their point in FAST AND FURIOUS to a new arms treaty, the agenda of oppression is upon us and is being enacted by our government in secret. The use of secrecy to pass treaties and to create laws that take away more of our Constitutional rights/Bill of Rights is biblical prophecy


These people are not working in our best interest. They are working to make us helpless and to make us slaves to their needs. Only the elite will have the rights we have come to love and take for granted. We need to rise up and fight these secret combinations!


Don't let the United States Constitution hang by a thread anymore than it already is. The U.N. is an agency that seems from the outside to be good, but what goes on behind the cloak of humanitarian help is treaties like this one. Do not be deceived!


 





Here is the build up that the media is putting out there so that this can be justified...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


 UN chief terms lack of arms trade treaty as “disgrace”

UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon. — Photo Reuters
UNITED NATIONS: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon pleaded on Tuesday for a binding pact to regulate the more than $60 billion global weapons market, while delegates at a treaty drafting conference worked to defuse a dispute over Palestinian participation. 
“We do not have a multilateral treaty of global scope dealing with conventional arms,” Ban told delegates to the conference, which runs through July 27. “This is a disgrace.” 
“Poorly regulated international arms transfers are fueling civil conflicts, destabilizing regions, and empowering terrorists and criminal networks,” he said. 
Arms control campaigners say one person every minute dies from armed violence around the world and that a convention is needed to prevent illicitly traded guns from pouring into conflict zones and fueling wars and atrocities. 
They say conflicts in Syria and elsewhere show a treaty is necessary. 
If the campaigners get their way, all signatories would be charged with enforcing compliance with any treaty by arms producers and with taking steps to prevent rogue dealers from operating within their borders...
read more at: http://dawn.com/2012/07/04/un-chief-terms-lack-of-arms-trade-treaty-is-disgrace/ 




Talks begin at U.N. on arms-trade treaty
July 04, 2012|By Ron DePasquale, Associated PressUNITED NATIONS - The world's nations began a final push Tuesday for the first legally binding global treaty that would regulate the international arms trade and try to prevent the transfer of weapons to armed groups and terrorists. 

The 193-member U.N. General Assembly is expected to approve the treaty, which has been in the works since 2006, when the United States voted against the resolution that launched the process. The Obama administration later reversed the George W. Bush administration's position and supported an assembly resolution to hold this year's four-week Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty. 


...The foreign ministers of the U.K., France, Germany and Sweden wrote in a Monday editorial in the Guardian newspaper that the treaty "should cover all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons, all types of munitions, and related technologies. It is also of great importance that the treaty includes strong provisions on human rights, international humanitarian law and sustainable development." 


read more at: http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-04/news/32537679_1_arms-trade-treaty-arms-trade-treaty-arms-and-light-weapons

J'lem seeks to stop 'Palestine' attending UN parley

By HERB KEINON
07/03/2012 21:21

The Palestinian flag is raised at UNESCO in ParisIsrael working to prevent Palestinians from participating in UN arms treaty conference as full fledged state rather than observer.

PhotoREUTERS/Benoit Tessier
Israel is actively working in key capitals around the world to prevent the Palestinians from participating in a UN arms trade treaty conference taking place in New York as a full-fledged state, and not merely as an observer, western diplomatic officials said Tuesday.

According to officials, Israel has lodged demarches in various capitals urging they work against seating the Palestinians as a state at the meeting, which aims to hammer out a binding treaty to regulate the global weapons market. The officials said Israel has let it be known that it would block the results of the treaty if the Palestinians were granted state status...



July UN Meeting to Discuss Global Arms Trade Treaty

Chinese officers check rifles of ARES Defense Systems, Inc from the U.S. at the Special Operations Forces Exhibition and Conference at King Abdullah I Airbase in Amman, Jordan, May 8, 2012.Andre deNesnera
Delegates from more than 150 countries are to meet next month (July 2-27) at the United Nations in New York to draft a global arms trade treaty.

The proposed legally-binding treaty would set international standards to regulate the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons - from aircraft carriers to machine guns and small arms.  Major arms exporters, such as the United States, and major importers, such as India, will participate...

Arms and ammo treaty
In addition to conventional weapons, experts such as Scott Stedjan, senior policy adviser with Oxfam America, said the treaty must also include ammunition.

"Every year, there are about 12 billion bullets produced throughout the world. And the value of that trade globally is around four billion dollars - in excess of $4 billion,” he said.

Stedjan said it is essential to have an international treaty regulating the arms and ammunition trade.
...
The Russian dimension
Russia - a major international arms dealer and Syria’s main weapons provider - will have a delegation at the conference.

Kimball said Moscow continues to abide by the weapons sale contracts it signed with Damascus before the conflict began.

The Proposed UN Small Arms Treaty; Pushed by Hillary Clinton

by Adrian Krieg

The greatest gun grab in world history is in the midst of debate in the UN and is being pushed by Obama, Holder, Clinton, and all of Obama's Czars. Citizens of the United States, in fact citizens around the world, deserve to know what this treaty, if ratified by the Senate, would mean to Americans. Here is a brief synopsis:



• If ratified by the Senate the treaty would void the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.


• The Treaty would violate the Tenth Amendment transferring and federalizing gun ownership, regulation and licensing nationally.


• Require the establishment of a national data bank (federal) of all gun owners.


• Ban the sale, transportation and trade of all semi-automatic guns that have been in use since the 1890s.


• Confiscate all "UNAUTHORIZED" (a word not defined in the document) civilian firearms.


• Require a federal license for the purchase and ownership of any gun.


The fact is that were this treaty to be ratified it would fundamentally change America, giving it the appearance of Australia and England where gun ownership is restricted and crime statistically has risen drastically since their gun bans. England has clearly demonstrated the failure of this during the recent riots in which merchants were unable to defend their property, which the police were unable to do.


The argument by proponents of this treaty is to stop the unauthorized sales of guns across international boundaries that they claim are arming criminals and terrorists and leading to gun violence. In order to bolster that argument, Eric Holder and the US Department of Justice engaged the BATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) to set up operation FAST & FURIOUS in which thousands of small arms were sold across the Mexican border, supplying the Mexican drug cartels with weapons. This was done with strong opposition by FFL licensees (gun dealers) who were in some instances told that their licenses would be reviewed if they did not cooperate with Fast and Furious. Over a dozen murders and the deaths of two federal agents are directly linked to Fast & Furious, which is now under review by congress.


The largest volume of small arms flooding the world markets are produced in China, the old Soviet republics, Israel, France and the United States. Since governments make all these sales, the treaty, which only regulates small arm sales to the private sector and to individual owners, will have no effect at all in the international arms bazaar. This treaty represents the elites' final move to disable people's resistance to the New World Order, something that they have been setting up for many decades.


For eons the global elite have had their eyes on everything that they desire to control. There appears to be nothing off the table. From arms for self-protection, to the seabed, the air, the climate, everything must be controlled by the power hungry elites. After all, we are far too stupid to fend for ourselves. Well, with what they have accomplished in the realm of education, bringing America from fourth in the world to 34th in just 30 years, you can gain understanding of their position. The nanny-state must protect you from your fellow citizens.


Well, not really. The enemy, as demonstrated in the immediate past, has not been our fellow citizens but in most cases their governments. Considering that in the 20th Century governments killed more people than all the wars including WWI and WWII, one can gain an understanding of the issue. In the Soviet empire alone from 1919 to its end over 200 million were killed, in China during the "Great Leap Forward" (Cultural Revolution) over 100 million were killed, in Germany and Italy perhaps ten million were killed. Frankly and honestly ,I would much rather trust my neighbor or even a stranger with a gun than any government agent.


This proposal, and let's hope that's all it will ever be, is the most massive attempt to control humanity undertaken since the beginning of recorded history. We have been told by no less an expert than Hillary Clinton that this is a fight against terrorism, insurgency, and international crime syndicates. It is in fact none of those. The world is awash with small arms, 98% of which were provided by or sold by governments. The control and/or elimination of private ownership of firearms will have zero effect on any of the aforementioned issues.



Let's make this abundantly clear. The Taliban, since the NATO incursion, facilitates the production of heroin, making Afghanistan the number one supplier of illicit drugs in the world. Before the NATO incursion into their country the Taliban had eliminated heroin production. They reinstated it to produce money to buy guns and munitions. Almost all guns of the Taliban are AK-47s and various versions of Kalashnikovs produced in China, Bulgaria, Russia and almost all of the old Soviet satellites. Other weapons used by the Taliban are American made, which they got from Afghan army deserters and theft. On our side of the pond the largest supplier of small arms in the past ten years to the Mexican drug cartels has been the BATF through operation Fast and Furious. France has supplied the Libyan rebels and when confronted by the gun-grabbers in Europe, the French government stated that they were not directly supplying the rebels but had no objection if other states in the Middle East supplied them with French arms.


On the Israel front, the Israelis have a long history of supplying their Lebanese Christian militias with arms and amendments and in fact using those militias as a surrogate captive army to destabilize Lebanon. The Israelis have also acted as intermediaries in small arms supplies to Central America, South America, various places in the Middle East, and in fact any place they can turn a shekel.


So the entire red herring of the proposed UN treaty on small arms is nothing but a veiled effort to establish world domination by removing the most obvious impediment to centralized control, the small arm.


source: http://www.thedailybell.com/2843/Adrian-Krieg-The-Proposed-UN-Small-Arms-Treaty-pushed-by-Hillary-Clinton








"Obama would like to erode gun owners' rights."

No comments: